NAIROBI, Kenya – A third-year law student at the University of Nairobi, Kevin Ndung’u Kiriga, has been fined a staggering Sh7.5 million by an Eldoret court after losing a defamation case linked to a Facebook post targeting Prophet David Owuor’s personal driver.
The post in question labeled the driver, Benard Kagia, as a “prostitute” and further insinuated that Kagia was failing to care for his family. The accusations didn’t just stir drama; they reportedly led to the breakdown of Kagia’s marriage.
Kiriga’s comments were deemed defamatory by Eldoret Chief Magistrate Dennis Mikoyan, who, in his ruling, emphasized the power—and the danger—of online speech.
“Civility on digital platforms is no longer optional,” Mikoyan said, adding that users who cross the line should expect serious legal repercussions.
Under Kenya’s Computer Misuse and Cybercrimes Act No. 5 of 2018, cyber harassment carries steep penalties, especially when it damages someone’s reputation or livelihood.
From Facebook Rant to Courtroom Reality
What started as a flurry of emotional posts on Facebook three years ago has now cost the student more than his pride.
According to court proceedings, Kiriga’s posts not only accused Kagia of infidelity but portrayed him as morally unfit and irresponsible—claims that, according to the plaintiff, had real-life fallout.
The legal drama underscores a growing trend in Kenya’s judicial system: holding individuals accountable for what they say online. Cases involving online defamation are rising as courts continue to interpret Kenya’s cybercrime laws, often setting hefty fines that send a clear message—watch your words.
No Assets, No Options? Student Says the Fine Is Too Much
While the law came down hard, Kiriga is pushing back, telling the court that he simply doesn’t have the means to pay. He claimed he owns no property or assets and cannot raise the Sh7.5 million awarded to the plaintiff.
With the matter set to return to court today, May 28, 2025, the big question now is: What happens if the student can’t pay? Will the court adjust the penalty, or is jail time a possibility if he fails to comply?
Whatever the outcome, the case serves as a cautionary tale in the era of digital expression.
Posting recklessly—especially when it involves personal attacks—can cost more than just followers.
In the age of screenshots and viral callouts, words can become legal liabilities.
Kiriga’s case is a wake-up call, especially for young Kenyans navigating social platforms without understanding the legal landmines beneath their fingertips. The courtroom might not care about your follower count—but it will care what you say with it.
