KISUMU, Kenya — A fresh political storm has erupted after Saboti MP Caleb Amisi issued a blunt critique of opposition mobilisation tactics and warned that Kenya’s political landscape is shifting beyond the influence of the late Raila Odinga, whose dominance once defined voting patterns in Nyanza and beyond.
In a strongly worded public statement, Amisi argued that the long-standing practice of opposition leaders urging supporters to “eat government money but vote elsewhere” only works under specific conditions—mainly when the politician in question has either never held office or has a solid, memorable record of development.
“But if you served in key positions in government before and left no known record, my friend, look for something else to do at home,” he said, suggesting that voters are increasingly rejecting leaders who cannot demonstrate tangible delivery.
Amisi contrasted this with Nyanza’s historical loyalty to Raila Odinga, saying the region famously resisted state influence and rejected attempts at government “goodies,” even confronting those marketing state projects. He framed this as a form of political discipline anchored in collective identity and strong opposition values.
“The only person with fanatical following was Raila Odinga and unfortunately, he is no more,” Amisi said, adding that current and future leaders—including President William Ruto—must now “work hard” to maintain or build a stable support base.
He also took aim at DCP Leader Rigathi Gachagua, in remarks that appeared to refer to Rigathi’s ongoing struggle to consolidate Mt Kenya support.
Amisi argued that lasting political dominance requires either insulating a region from government patronage or cultivating a deeply rooted opposition culture. Without this, he said, “you can’t bake your cake and have it.”
Political analysts say Amisi’s comments reflect growing realignments across the country following Odinga’s death, as leaders and voters renegotiate identity, loyalty, and expectations.
Raila’s long career created dependable voting blocs—especially in Nyanza—and his absence has opened space for new actors while also exposing ideological rifts.
The MP’s remarks also speak to a broader debate on whether Kenya is entering an era where delivery, economic performance, and localised interests outweigh traditional political alignments. This shift has been accelerated by economic hardships, governance disputes, and growing scrutiny of elected leaders.
Amisi concluded his statement with a call for a national “renaissance,” underscoring what he described as the need for accountability and merit-driven politics. While his message was posted in a personal capacity, it has stirred intense discussion online, especially among supporters of both the Kenya Kwanza administration and the opposition.
With political coalitions reshaping and succession battles simmering, his remarks are likely to fuel further debate about the future of regional kingpins, party influence, and the nature of voter loyalty in a post-Raila Kenya.
