UASIN GISHU, Kenya – Kapseret MP Oscar Sudi has hit back at criticism of the broad-based government deal, insisting the political arrangement between President William Ruto and ODM leader Raila Odinga remains strong and unshaken.
Speaking on Friday during a funeral in Moi’s Bridge, Uasin Gishu County, Sudi dismissed remarks by Nairobi Senator Edwin Sifuna, who recently questioned the credibility and purpose of the deal that has seen increased cooperation between ruling and opposition parties.
“Let Sifuna say whatever he wants on television, but the broad-based government will not be shaken,” Sudi declared. “This is a political understanding between party leaders, and those who were not at the table have no mandate to discredit it.”
Sudi urged Sifuna to focus on service delivery and avoid divisive rhetoric.
“If there’s money to spend, we would rather use it to build roads and infrastructure in Nairobi,” he added.
The Kapseret legislator also emphasized that the deal’s main objective is national unity, and those not involved in the high-level talks should respect the process.
Allies Rally Behind Ruto and Raila Pact
Sudi was accompanied by Soy MP David Kiplagat and Taita Taveta Woman Representative Haika Mizighi, both of whom echoed his support for the power-sharing agreement.
Kiplagat criticized Sifuna’s continued opposition to the deal, suggesting that if the ODM Secretary-General is uncomfortable with his party’s engagement in government affairs, he is free to form his own political movement.
“ODM is part of the government. If Sifuna is uncomfortable with that, then perhaps it’s time he considers stepping aside and starting his own path,” said Kiplagat.
Both leaders expressed strong support for President Ruto, urging Kenyans to give his administration more time to fulfil development promises and unify the country.
“We’re firmly behind the President and will work to ensure he gets the support he needs to deliver and eventually secure a second term,” Kiplagat added.
The broad-based government deal has continued to stir debate across political circles, with some leaders hailing it as a bold step toward inclusive governance, while others argue it dilutes party identity and public accountability.
