NAIROBI, Kenya — The High Court has declined to grant bail to police officer Klinzy Baraza, citing compelling reasons including witness protection, public safety concerns, and the unique circumstances surrounding the fatal shooting of a civilian in Nairobi’s central business district.
In its ruling, the court said the case had attracted intense public attention and that details of the shooting were already widely circulated, raising concerns over the safety of the deceased’s family and potential witnesses.
The court noted that members of the victim’s family had reported harassment, including receiving unsolicited calls and messages, which the judge said underscored the need for enhanced protection.
Baraza is charged in connection with the shooting of Boniface Kariuki, a mask vendor who was shot in the head outside Imenti House on June 17, 2025. Kariuki later died while undergoing treatment.
In denying bail, the court observed that Baraza’s position as a serving police officer presented a heightened risk of interference with witnesses or the ongoing investigation.
“The accused, by virtue of being a law enforcement officer, wields powers that could potentially be abused to interfere with witnesses and compromise the administration of justice,” the court held.
The judge agreed with the prosecution that granting bail at this stage could jeopardise the safety of victims and witnesses, as well as public order and security, meeting the constitutional threshold of “compelling reasons” required to deny bail.
While Baraza told the court that he would comply with all conditions imposed and cited his family responsibilities, including caring for young children, the judge ruled that these personal considerations did not outweigh the risks identified by the prosecution.
The court directed that the trial be fast-tracked, noting the public interest surrounding the case and the need for expeditious justice.
The matter has been placed before the court registry for further directions on February 17, 2026, with Baraza set to remain in custody as proceedings continue.
The ruling adds to ongoing scrutiny of police conduct and accountability in the use of lethal force, particularly in cases involving unarmed civilians in public spaces.
