NAIROBI, Kenya — Former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua has said he is prepared for any outcome from the High Court as it prepares to rule on his impeachment case, stressing his confidence in the judiciary while maintaining readiness to pursue further legal action if necessary.
Speaking on Sunday during a church service in Karen, Gachagua said he believes the court will deliver justice not only to him but also to his supporters, in a case that has drawn national attention since his removal from office in 2024.
“We are ready for whatever outcome. If the three judges rule that we were treated unfairly and against the law and lift the impeachment, we shall be grateful to God,” he said.
Confidence in Judiciary, Appeal Option Open
Gachagua expressed confidence in the independence of the judiciary, stating that he expects an impartial ruling from the three-judge bench scheduled to deliver its decision on Monday, June 8, 2026.
“I have confidence that our judiciary is independent, impartial, and will give justice,” he said.
However, he added that he will proceed to the Court of Appeal if the High Court ruling does not go in his favour, emphasizing that all legal remedies provided under the Constitution remain open.
“If the ruling goes the other way, it is still okay, we will still have an opportunity to go to the Court of Appeal,” he stated.
Call for Calm Among Supporters
The former Deputy President also urged his supporters to remain peaceful regardless of the outcome of the case, amid heightened political attention ahead of the ruling.
“I want to urge my supporters that, irrespective of the outcome, to remain calm and peaceful,” he said.
The statement comes as the country awaits a critical judgment that could have significant political implications for Gachagua and his political future.
Background to the Impeachment Case
Gachagua was impeached on October 18, 2024, after the Senate upheld charges previously approved by the National Assembly. The motion, tabled by Kibwezi West MP Mwengi Mutuse, cited gross violations of the Constitution and alleged undermining of the President and Cabinet.
He challenged the impeachment in court, arguing that the process violated constitutional requirements, including fair hearing provisions and adequate public participation during the National Assembly proceedings.
His legal team maintains that the impeachment process was flawed, while the state has defended the procedure as lawful and constitutionally grounded.
The High Court ruling expected on Monday is likely to shape the next phase of the legal and political battle surrounding his removal from office.
